Flask vs CherryPy: What Should Python Developers Choose?

In the world of Python web frameworks, Flask and CherryPy stand out as two popular options. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, making it essential for Python developers to understand their differences and choose the one that aligns with their project requirements. In this article, we’ll delve into the Flask vs. CherryPy debate, exploring various aspects to help you make an informed decision.


Python, known for its simplicity and versatility, offers a plethora of web frameworks to choose from. Flask and CherryPy are two such frameworks that cater to different needs and preferences. In this article, we’ll explore their features, advantages, disadvantages, and real-world use cases to help you decide which one suits your project best.

Flask: A Micro Web Framework

Features of Flask

Flask is a micro web framework that keeps things simple and allows developers to add the components they need as they go. It offers URL routing, templating, and session management, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized applications.

Pros of Using Flask

  • Lightweight and minimalistic.
  • High level of customization.
  • Extensive community support.
  • Excellent documentation.
  • Ideal for prototyping and small projects.

Cons of Using Flask

  • Limited built-in features.
  • Might require more third-party extensions for complex projects.

CherryPy: A Minimalist Approach

Features of CherryPy

CherryPy, like Flask, is a minimalist framework, but it provides a more structured approach to web application development. It includes a built-in web server and supports HTTP/1.1.

Pros of Using CherryPy

  • Simplicity and ease of use.
  • Built-in server for quick development.
  • Well-suited for small to medium-sized applications.
  • Minimalistic design promotes clean code.

Cons of Using CherryPy

  • Smaller community compared to Flask.
  • Fewer third-party extensions available.
  • May not be the best choice for large-scale applications.

Performance Comparison

Performance is a critical factor when choosing a web framework. Flask, being minimalistic, tends to outperform CherryPy in terms of speed. However, the actual performance depends on various factors, including the specific use case and optimizations applied.


Flask and CherryPy can both handle small to medium-sized applications well. However, Flask’s modular design and a wider range of extensions make it a more flexible choice for scaling larger projects.

Ease of Learning

Both frameworks are relatively easy to learn for Python developers. Flask’s simplicity makes it an excellent choice for beginners, while CherryPy’s structured approach can be beneficial for those who prefer more guidance.

Community and Ecosystem

Flask has a larger and more active community, resulting in extensive documentation, tutorials, and a wide array of third-party extensions. CherryPy’s community is smaller but dedicated, offering support and resources for users.

Use Cases

Flask is suitable for a wide range of projects, including APIs, web applications, and microservices. CherryPy is best suited for projects where a minimalist approach is preferred and HTTP/1.1 compliance is necessary.

Extensibility and Customization

Flask’s extensive ecosystem of extensions allows for high levels of customization. CherryPy, while more structured, may require more custom code for specific functionalities.


Both frameworks have good security features, but Flask’s larger community and extensive documentation make it easier to find security best practices and resources.

Deployment and Hosting

Deploying Flask and CherryPy applications is straightforward. They can be hosted on various platforms, including cloud providers and traditional web servers.

Documentation and Support

Flask boasts comprehensive documentation and a wealth of tutorials, making it easier for developers to get started. CherryPy’s documentation is good but not as extensive.

Which One Should You Choose?

The choice between Flask and CherryPy depends on your project’s specific needs. Flask is an excellent choice for quick development, while CherryPy offers more structure and HTTP/1.1 compliance. Consider the size and complexity of your project, your familiarity with each framework, and the level of community support required.

Case Studies

Explore real-world case studies of projects developed using Flask and CherryPy to gain insights into how each framework performs in practical scenarios.


In the Flask vs. CherryPy debate, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Both frameworks have their strengths and are valuable tools for Python developers. Assess your project’s requirements, consider the trade-offs, and choose the framework that aligns best with your goals.


1. Is Flask better than CherryPy for all projects?

  • No, it depends on the project’s size and requirements. Flask is more versatile, but CherryPy’s structure can be advantageous for certain scenarios.

2. Are Flask and CherryPy actively maintained?

  • Yes, both frameworks are actively maintained by their respective communities.

3. Can I switch from Flask to CherryPy (or vice versa) mid-project?

  • It’s possible but can be challenging due to differences in design and structure. It’s better to choose the right framework from the start.

4. Which framework has better performance?

  • Flask tends to have better performance for small to medium-sized applications, but actual performance depends on various factors.

5. Are there any notable companies using Flask and CherryPy?

  • Yes, many companies use both frameworks for various web applications and services.
Get A Quote

Sign Up To Get The Latest Digital Trends

Our Newsletter